RetroSearch Browse

Mon Dec 1 01:17:02 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-December/137371.html

Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> writes:

> I have never heard of git losing history.

In my experience talking with Git users about this problem, that depends
on a very narrow definition of “losing history”.

Git encourages re-writing, and thereby losing prior versions of, the
history of a branch. The commit information remains, but the history of
how they link together is lost. That is a loss of information, which is
not the case in the absence of such history re-writing.

Git users differ in whether they consider that information loss
important; but it is, objectively, losing history information. So
Ethan's impression is correct on this point.

-- 
 \       “If you see an animal and you can't tell if it's a skunk or a |
  `\   cat, here's a good saying to help: ‘Black and white, stinks all |
_o__)              right. Tabby-colored, likes a fella.’” —Jack Handey |
Ben Finney

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-December/137371.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 481 - Migrate Some Supporting Repositories to Git and Github