R. David Murray writes: > Also, as has been discussed in this thread previously, any program that > deals with filenames is dealing with human readable languages, even > if posix itself treats the filenames as bytes. That's a bit extreme. I can name two interesting applications offhand: git's object database and the Coda filesystem's containers. It's true that for debugging purposes bytestrings representing largish numbers are readably encoded (in hexadecimal and decimal, respectively), but they're clearly not "human readable" in the sense you mean. Nevertheless, these are the applications that prove your rule. You don't need the power of pathlib to conveniently (for the programmer) and efficiently handle the file structures these programs use. os.path is plenty.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4