On 8/21/2014 7:25 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > On 22 Aug 2014 04:45, "Benjamin Peterson" <benjamin at python.org > <mailto:benjamin at python.org>> wrote: > > > > Perhaps some board members could comment, but I hope the PSF could just > > pay a few hundred a year for a proper certificate. > > That's exactly what we're doing - MAL reminded me we reached the same > conclusion last time this came up, we'll just track it better this time > to make sure it doesn't slip through the cracks again. > > (And yes, switching to forced HTTPS once this is addressed would also be > a good idea - we'll add it to the list) I just switched from a 'low variety' short password of the sort almost crackable with brute force (today, though not several years ago) to a higher variety longer password. People with admin privileges on the tracker might be reminded to recheck. What was adequate 10 years ago is not so now. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4