On 22 August 2014 00:41, Armin Rigo <arigo at tunes.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 18 August 2014 22:30, Oleg Broytman <phd at phdru.name> wrote: >> Aha, I see now -- the signing certificate is CAcert, which I've >> installed manually. > > I don't suppose anyone is particularly annoyed by this fact? I know > for sure two classes of people that will never click "Ignore". The > first one is people that, for lack of a less negative term, I'll call > "security freaks". The second is "serious business people" to which > the shiny new look of python.org appeals; they are likely to heed the > warning "Legitimate banks, stores, etc. will never ask you to do this" > and would regard an official hint to ignore it as highly > unprofessional. I've now raised this issue with the infrastructure team. The current hosting arrangements for bugs.python.org were put in place when the PSF didn't have any on-call system administrators of its own, but now that we do, it may be time to migrate that service to a location where we can switch to a more appropriate SSL certificate. Anyone interested in following the discussion further may wish to join infrastructure at python.org Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4