A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-August/135879.html below:

[Python-Dev] Bytes path support

[Python-Dev] Bytes path support [Python-Dev] Bytes path supportBenjamin Peterson benjamin at python.org
Tue Aug 19 19:40:29 CEST 2014
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014, at 10:31, Ben Hoyt wrote:
> > The official policy is that we want them [support for bytes paths in stdlib functions] to go away, but reality so far has not budged. We will continue to hold our breath though. :-)
> 
> Does that mean that new APIs should explicitly not support bytes? I'm
> thinking of os.scandir() (PEP 471), which I'm implementing at the
> moment. I was originally going to make it support bytes so it was
> compatible with listdir, but maybe that's a bad idea. Bytes paths are
> essentially broken on Windows.

Bytes paths are "essential" on Unix, though, so I don't think we should
create new low-level APIs that don't support bytes.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4