RetroSearch Browse

Mon Aug 18 02:08:24 CEST 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-August/135843.html

On 18 Aug 2014 09:57, "Barry Warsaw" <barry at python.org> wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2014, at 09:12 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> >I'm talking more generally - do you *really* want to be explaining that
> >"bytes" behaves like a tuple of integers, while "bytes.bytes" behaves
like
> >a tuple of bytes?
>
> I would explain it differently though, using concrete examples.
>
>     data = bytes(...)
>     for i in data: # iterate over data as integers
>     for i in data.bytes: # iterate over data as bytes
>
> But whatever.  I just wish there was something better than iterbytes.

There's actually another aspect to your idea, independent of the naming:
exposing a view rather than just an iterator. I'm going to have to look at
the implications for memoryview, but it may be a good way to go (and would
align with the iterator -> view changes in dict).

Cheers,
Nick.

>
> -Barry
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140818/faa049a9/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-August/135843.html below:

Minor API improvements for bytes & bytearray