Sounds good to me. On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote: > Currently most functions which accepts string argument which then passed > to C function as NUL-terminated string, reject strings with embedded NUL > character and raise TypeError. ValueError looks more appropriate here, > because argument type is correct (str), only its value is wrong. But this > is backward incompatible change. > > I think that we should get rid of this legacy inconsistency sooner or > later. Why not fix it right now? I have opened an issue on the tracker [1], > but this issue requires more broad discussion. > > [1] http://bugs.python.org/issue22215 > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ > guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140817/de1efe68/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4