Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-August/135814.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 4000 to explicitly declare we won't be doing a Py3k style compatibility break again?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 4000 to explicitly declare we won't be doing a Py3k style compatibility break again?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 4000 to explicitly declare we won't be doing a Py3k style compatibility break again?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Aug 16, 2014, at 7:43 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:

> But can we really say there won't be a 4.0? Never? Why not? Who is to say that at some point some folks won't be going off on their own to design a whole new language and name it Python 4, following Larry Wall's Perl 6 example?

If they ever do, please make them not follow the Perl 6 example!

-- 
Best regards,
Łukasz Langa

WWW: http://lukasz.langa.pl/
Twitter: @llanga
IRC: ambv on #python-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140816/2da0325a/attachment.html>

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 4000 to explicitly declare we won't be doing a Py3k style compatibility break again?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 4000 to explicitly declare we won't be doing a Py3k style compatibility break again?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4