Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> writes: > If people were going to be prone to mistake > > with (a, b, c): ... > > as including a tuple … because the parens are a strong signal “this is an expression to be evaluated, resulting in a single value to use in the statement”. > they would have already mistaken: > > with a, b, c: ... > > the same way. But they haven't. Right. The presence or absence of parens make a big semantic difference. -- \ “The process by which banks create money is so simple that the | `\ mind is repelled.” —John Kenneth Galbraith, _Money: Whence It | _o__) Came, Where It Went_, 1975 | Ben Finney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4