On 08/12/2014 08:38 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > > [1] Technically not, since it's the comma, not the ( ), which makes a > tuple, but a lot of people don't know that and treat it as if it the > parens were compulsary. It might as well be, because if there can be a non-tuple way to interpret the comma that way takes precedence, and then the parens /are/ required to disambiguate and get the tuple you wanted. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4