On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda at gmail.com> wrote: > I think this thread is probably Python-Ideas territory... > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Allen Li <cyberdupo56 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Currently, this works with explicit line continuation, but as all style > > guides favor implicit line continuation over explicit, it would be nice > > if you could do the following: > > > > with (open('foo') as foo, > > open('bar') as bar, > > open('baz') as baz, > > open('spam') as spam, > > open('eggs') as eggs): > > pass > > The parentheses seem unnecessary/redundant/weird. Why not allow > newlines in-between "with" and the terminating ":"? > > with open('foo') as foo, > open('bar') as bar, > open('baz') as baz: > pass > That way lies Coffeescript. Too much guessing. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140812/33a2da87/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4