I think this thread is probably Python-Ideas territory... On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Allen Li <cyberdupo56 at gmail.com> wrote: > Currently, this works with explicit line continuation, but as all style > guides favor implicit line continuation over explicit, it would be nice > if you could do the following: > > with (open('foo') as foo, > open('bar') as bar, > open('baz') as baz, > open('spam') as spam, > open('eggs') as eggs): > pass The parentheses seem unnecessary/redundant/weird. Why not allow newlines in-between "with" and the terminating ":"? with open('foo') as foo, open('bar') as bar, open('baz') as baz: pass -- Devin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4