A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-August/135717.html below:

[Python-Dev] class Foo(object) vs class Foo: should be clearly explained in python 2 and 3 doc

[Python-Dev] class Foo(object) vs class Foo: should be clearly explained in python 2 and 3 doc [Python-Dev] class Foo(object) vs class Foo: should be clearly explained in python 2 and 3 docBarry Warsaw barry at python.org
Sun Aug 10 18:26:39 CEST 2014
On Aug 10, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:

>This is not true.  An alternative is to put
>
>__metaclass__ = type
>
>at the top of your module to make all classes in your module new-style in
>python2.

I like this much better, and it's what I do in my own bilingual code.  It
makes it much easier to remove the unnecessary cruft when you drop the Python
2 support.

-Barry
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4