A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-August/135707.html below:

[Python-Dev] os.walk() is going to be *fast* with scandir

[Python-Dev] os.walk() is going to be *fast* with scandir [Python-Dev] os.walk() is going to be *fast* with scandirAntoine Pitrou antoine at python.org
Sun Aug 10 05:20:27 CEST 2014 
Le 09/08/2014 12:43, Ben Hoyt a écrit :
> Just thought I'd share some of my excitement about how fast the all-C
> version [1] of os.scandir() is turning out to be.
>
> Below are the results of my scandir / walk benchmark run with three
> different versions. I'm using an SSD, which seems to make it
> especially faster than listdir / walk. Note that benchmark results can
> vary a lot, depending on operating system, file system, hard drive
> type, and the OS's caching state.
>
> Anyway, os.walk() can be FIFTY times as fast using os.scandir().

Very nice results, thank you :-)

Regards

Antoine.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4