Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-August/135660.html below:

[Python-Dev] Surely "nullable" is a reasonable name?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Surely "nullable" is a reasonable name?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Surely "nullable" is a reasonable name?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote:

> 'allow_none' is definitely clearer.


I disagree. Unlike "nullable", "allow_none" does not tell me what happens
on the C side when I pass in None.  If the receiving type is PyObject*,
either NULL or Py_None is a valid choice.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140804/38ed3c22/attachment.html>

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Surely "nullable" is a reasonable name?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Surely "nullable" is a reasonable name?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4