R. David Murray writes: > My unix fix-width terminal font handles most unicode (even a lot of > non-bmp stuff...though I have no idea if it is readable :). Oh, I bet you do. With a true fixed-width Unicode font, it's the *Latin-character* text that's painful, if not unreadable, because the aspect ratio needs to be close to 1.0 to handle ideographs, rather than the 0.5 or less common with Latin fonts. XTerm has an option to treat ideographs as double width. That does the trick (at least, I don't know any scripts that really really want an aspect ratio of 0.7 or 2.0).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4