A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/134245.html below:

[Python-Dev] Patches in need of review

[Python-Dev] Patches in need of review [Python-Dev] Patches in need of reviewTerry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Thu Apr 24 01:07:24 CEST 2014
On 4/23/2014 3:27 PM, Claudiu Popa wrote:

> * http://bugs.python.org/issue16104
>
> `Use multiprocessing in compileall script`
>
> This patch adds a new command line argument to `compileall`, also
> a new argument to `compileall.compile_dir`, which controls the number
> of worker processes used to compile a given directory.
> The title of the issue is actually misleading a little,
> because the patch uses `concurrent.futures` instead.

I think titles should give goal, not intended or expected method.
I changed the title accordingly.
Compileall script: add option to use multiple cores

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4