-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/20/2014 07:37 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > Ultimately, every time we add *any* sort of compatibility feature to > Python 3 (Unicode literals, bytes interpolation, this) we are sending > the message that we made a mistake in the design of Python 3. It's > certainly possible that's the case (we didn't have a lot of hard data > to go on) but I do think we should have a little more confidence in > our judgement here. We clearly made mistakes, especially in how we thought migration would occur: nobody expected that we would see straddling / compatible subset as the dominant porting strategy. Re-adding features to make the strategy that works less painful is just acknowledging that fact. Mark such features as BBB-only / deprecated-but-never-to-be-removed, and move on: "practicality beats purity". Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver at palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlNT4gcACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4a3wCfcKZWldlrPzNn6byYJrCxm1XG ttUAniKTQ6ma0n7XNIMf0lP4A1zexT6j =AkQ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4