RetroSearch Browse

Sun Apr 20 15:32:16 CEST 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/134212.html

On 20/04/2014 06:31, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time to write this up, Nick.
>
> However, I am -1 on it.  One of the allures of Python 3 is the increase
> in simplicity and elegance.  Restoring cruft does not help with that.
> Python 2 idioms that get restored to Python 3 must have real value:
> unicode literals, wire-protocol interpolations -- I don't feel that this
> comes any where close to meeting that bar.
>
> --
> ~Ethan~

+1 for this summary which echoes my sentiments entirely.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask 
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/134212.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 469: Restoring the iterkeys/values/items() methods