RetroSearch Browse

Sun Apr 20 00:56:52 CEST 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/134199.html

On Apr 19, 2014, at 02:12 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' wrote:

>I don't see this as a key porting hassle *at all* and I don't understand
>why they think this would significantly help their porting (it wouldn't).
>The only real barrier is the str/bytes conversion, really, and this is even
>more true for projects massively centered around IO, such as Twisted and,
>I'm sure, the main (only?) reason why Twisted hasn't been ported yet.

I agree.  I've been trying to get rid of iter*() when porting because most of
the time, there is no significant memory savings to be achieved anyway.

-Barry

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/134199.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 469: Restoring the iterkeys/values/items() methods