On Apr 18, 2014, at 4:50 PM, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote: > So I’m not really worried about a competition or anything. I’m mostly worried > about confusion of users. What you’re suggestion we give to use is *two* ways > to install Python packages (and 2 or 3 ways to virtualize a Python instance). > That provides extra cognitive burden for people who are new to Python. They > have to both understand that the packages you install from Conda are different > than the ones you install from pip, and that they come from different places. > If a new user is reasonably likely to have to use ``pip install`` when they are > using pip, then I think that provides a worse experience than only having to > use one tool to manage your packages. This confusion is going to be worse when > new users find a library they want to use and it tells them to use > ``pip install`` (or even easy_install!) even if Anaconda itself has a package > inside of it. Typo - When they are using conda. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140418/fd455423/attachment.sig>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4