RetroSearch Browse

Tue Apr 15 00:18:40 CEST 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/134007.html

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Glenn Linderman <v+python at g.nevcal.com>wrote:

>  On 4/14/2014 2:51 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>  consider freezing all the modules
>
> ...
>
>  Now the question is whether the maintenance cost of having to rebuild
> Python for a select number of stdlib modules
>
>
> "all" versus "select number".
>
> So I'm guessing the proposal is to freeze all the modules that Python
> imports just to get itself running, which would consume no additional
> memory when frozen, and saves time per your performance numbers, rather
> than the whole stdlib, which is what is sort of implied by "all".
>

Yes, exactly.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140414/bda57acd/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/134007.html below:

[Python-Dev] this is what happens if you freeze all the modules required for startup