On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote: > > On Apr 14, 2014, at 3:53 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > > > On 4/14/2014 11:32 AM, Steve Dower wrote: > [...] > >> However unfair > >> and incorrect it may be, there is a perception in some businesses > >> that open-source projects do not want contributions from them. > > > For PSF/CPython, this is so untrue that it looks to me like an excuse to > take without giving back. This might be 'unfair and incorrect', but it is > my perception. > > As someone who *has* given back, I can certainly understand why someone > would feel that way. It often times *does* feel like CPython doesn’t want > contributions. > Donald, your remark in itself sounds unnecessarily (and unproductively!) passive-aggressive. What have we done wrong to you, and what can we do to avoid making the same mistake in the future (to you, and to others)? [PS. When I appeared to write "Pylon brain fry" earlier in this thread, that was an unfortunate auto-correct for "PyCon brain fry". We need to get "PyCon" into the dictionary...] -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140414/411a22c2/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4