On 4/13/2014 2:46 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > As for the request "Are you sure that the patch is ready": this is > *very* difficult to answer for the author. We all have experienced > that patches that we considered good were critized out of nowhere, > and I just did the same to Nikolaus. There is just no way to tell > in advance whether people will approve a certain change or not, because > people will apply other criteria than oneself. What I suggested is that he make sure that the patch *appears* to be ready, as far as he can tell, according to our *minimum* criteria -- and that he so indicate. There is a big difference between a bare code patch and a whitespace-tested code + test + doc + ack patch, with a news entry suggested only in the text, if at all. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4