Am 13.04.14 03:07, schrieb Benjamin Peterson: > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014, at 17:30, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >> I apologize for the tone. I need to go *right* now, and can't fix >> that. Really, I'm sympathetic and my goal is not just to defend >> python-dev, but to help you get the reviews your work deserves. >> Please read with that in mind. > > I don't think Nikolaus is wrong to post here. I often tell people that > sometimes the only way to get your patches in is to constantly poke us > about it. I agree. If I had more time than I actually do, I would have responded with my 5-for-1 deal. Instead, I just looked at some of the patches, and commented on further improvements. As for the request "Are you sure that the patch is ready": this is *very* difficult to answer for the author. We all have experienced that patches that we considered good were critized out of nowhere, and I just did the same to Nikolaus. There is just no way to tell in advance whether people will approve a certain change or not, because people will apply other criteria than oneself. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4