On Apr 10, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote: >There's absolutely no reason to exempt CFFI, IMHO. On the contrary -- the >dependence on other 3rd party modules (PLY and pycparesr), and the related >dilemma of whether to expose each/both as stdlib modules or hide as >internal implementation details -- makes a PEP even more important here. Agreed. We've already started down the slippery slope of bundling third party packages (e.g. the ensurepip dependencies) and this is causing headaches for some of us distro guys. Either they're in the stdlib or their not. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4