RetroSearch Browse

Thu Apr 10 09:43:57 CEST 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/133892.html

Le 10/04/2014 04:09, Senthil Kumaran a écrit :
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org
> <mailto:benjamin at python.org>> wrote:
>
>     I consider the security enhancement/feature question to be in the domain
>     of PEP 466. If security stuff lands in the 2.7 branch, it will get
>     released eventually is all I'm saying.
>
>
> Thanks for the response.
>
>>> Instead dealing 2.7 will just be completely optional for coredevelopers
>
> I was worried about this part, that if bug-fixes are
> optionally back-ported, then we may end up a inconsistent, undesirable
> state.

They already are. There are routinely things I (and other developers) 
don't consider for inclusion in 2.x.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/133892.html below:

[Python-Dev] death to 2.7; long live 2.7