I think this is pretty much what Nick Coghlan implied at the summit. On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org>wrote: > This email is to share idea that has been bouncing around in my head for > a while about 2.7 releases. Guido's last email containing notes from the > language summit made me think it's time to propose it. > > We'll keep doing what we're currently doing for another year, making > normal bug fix releases with installers. After that, we _won't_ close > 2.7 to normal bug fixes as is currently implied by the release schedule. > Instead dealing 2.7 will just be completely optional for core > developers. (The much anticipated vendor support arrives at this point.) > Releases will continue at a measured (6-12 months) pace. These releases > will be source only (unless someone steps up to make installers). > > Planning-on-making-2.7-releases-'til-the-cows-come-home-ly yours, > Benjamin > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140409/7dc990cd/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4