2014-04-08 3:04 GMT+02:00 Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info>: >> > >Python used to have an alias <> for != and I for one miss <> in 3.x. I >> > >don't think TOOWTDI should be the last word in this debate. >> > >> > PEP 401 to the rescue: >> >> It occurs to me that since that Aprils' Fools joke is many years old >> now, we should remove it. > > -1 on removal. > > It makes a nice Easter Egg, especially now that "import this" has become > less of an Easter Egg and more of a standard Python module :-) I'm also against the removal of jokes! Removing the antigravity module would break the backward compatibility! from __futures__ import braces! Ten years ago, we asked me to add the "IPv6" feature in a firewall. I started to implement the RFC 1924 to have a full support. In the C language, handling the base 85 is not simple because you need arithmetic operations on large integers (128 bits). https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1924 3 days later, when my code was working, I saw the date of the RFC... I was young and naive :-) Victor
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4