So what? Aren't we allowed to have fun? :-) On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org>wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014, at 18:04, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 03:04:18PM -0700, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014, at 14:58, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > > > On Apr 07, 2014, at 05:47 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > > > > > > > > >Python used to have an alias <> for != and I for one miss <> in > 3.x. I > > > > >don't think TOOWTDI should be the last word in this debate. > > > > > > > > PEP 401 to the rescue: > > > > > > It occurs to me that since that Aprils' Fools joke is many years old > > > now, we should remove it. > > > > -1 on removal. > > You can't be serious. > > > > > It makes a nice Easter Egg, especially now that "import this" has become > > less of an Easter Egg and more of a standard Python module :-) > > It's a terrible Easter Egg because it's basically a CPython core > developer in-joke. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140407/70a312ab/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4