RetroSearch Browse

Mon Apr 7 21:21:02 CEST 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/133801.html

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:54 PM, francis <francismb at email.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> So, I guess as far as I'm concerned, this is ready to go. Feedback
> welcome:
>>   http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0465/
>>
>
> Hi,
> just curiosity: why is the second parameter 'o2' in:
>
> PyObject* PyObject_MatrixMultiply(PyObject *o1, PyObject o2)
>
> not a pointer to PyObject?

Because typo. Thanks for the catch :-)

-- 
Nathaniel J. Smith
Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh
http://vorpus.org

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/133801.html below:

A dedicated infix operator for matrix multiplication