RetroSearch Browse

Mon Sep 30 19:38:07 CEST 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-September/129105.html

On 09/29/2013 08:55 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Eric V. Smith <eric at trueblade.com
> <mailto:eric at trueblade.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 9/27/2013 9:14 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> 
>     > I don't see any issue with redirecting the discussion.
>     python-tulip@ is
>     > acting like a SIG for the module, so no real precedent beyond it not
>     > being hosted as a mail.python.org <http://mail.python.org>
>     <http://mail.python.org> list.
> 
>     I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I'd like the discussion to take place
>     on a python.org <http://python.org> mailing list. I don't want to
>     log in to a Google
>     property, and I don't trust them with the mailing list archives.
> 
>     I know my voice counts less than active Tulip discussion participants,
>     but now at least I feel better for having said something.
> 
> 
> I wish you'd said something a looong time ago when it would have been
> easy to move the list. Even if we moved it now we'd have split archives.
> Also, I'm not sure where the paranoia comes from. FWIW I'm less worried
> about Google reading my personal email than about the python.org
> <http://python.org> webmasters reading it.

I wish I'd known the project would be such a success! I have a use for
tulip, but not much time to offer development help currently, so I'll
live with the outcome. I'd love to see it make 3.4.

Eric.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-September/129105.html below:

[Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio