Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-September/129090.html below:

[Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrap) TL;DR and Usage Scenario
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:
> My guess is, a lot of people would be disappointed if Tulip missed 3.4.  I
> suspect the community would rather we slip the beta a little if it meant it
> the difference between Tulip and no Tulip.

+1

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrap) TL;DR and Usage Scenario
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4