RetroSearch Browse

Mon Sep 30 02:40:19 CEST 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-September/129080.html

On 9/27/2013 9:14 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:

> I don't see any issue with redirecting the discussion. python-tulip@ is
> acting like a SIG for the module, so no real precedent beyond it not
> being hosted as a mail.python.org <http://mail.python.org> list. 

I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I'd like the discussion to take place
on a python.org mailing list. I don't want to log in to a Google
property, and I don't trust them with the mailing list archives.

I know my voice counts less than active Tulip discussion participants,
but now at least I feel better for having said something.

-- 
Eric.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-September/129080.html below:

[Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio