RetroSearch Browse

Sat Sep 28 18:53:47 CEST 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-September/129061.html

> On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> It sounds like a reasonable approach to me.
> 
> In terms of naming, would you consider "concurrent.asyncio"? When we created that parent namespace for futures, one of the other suggested submodules discussed was the standard event loop API.
> 
+1 but up to guido

> Cheers,
> Nick.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jnoller%40gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130928/8977b54b/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-September/129061.html below:

[Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio