Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-September/129052.html below:

[Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:59:05 +1000
Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> It sounds like a reasonable approach to me.
> 
> In terms of naming, would you consider "concurrent.asyncio"? When we
> created that parent namespace for futures, one of the other suggested
> submodules discussed was the standard event loop API.

-10. Please, let's stop it.

Regards

Antoine.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4