On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:19:59 -0700 Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:43:48 -0400 > > Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote: > > > 2013/9/26 Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Benjamin Peterson < > > benjamin at python.org> > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> 2013/9/26 Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com>: > > > >> > Hi All, > > > >> > > > > >> > Earlier this morning I had a slight tackle with a couple of the 3.4 > > bots > > > >> > (sorry everyone!). I fixed some problems in asdl.py - > > > >> > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/21d46e3ae60c - and used the 'with' > > > >> > statement. Some bots don't have Python 2.6+ and couldn't bootstrap > > > >> > Python-ast.h/c > > > >> > > > > >> > Two questions: > > > >> > > > > >> > * Should I always check-in Python-ast.h and Python-ast.c when I > > touch > > > >> > asdl* > > > >> > ? The generated files are unchanged, it's only the timestamp that > > > >> > changed. > > > >> > * Can we, in theory, use new Pythons for asdl* code, because > > > >> > Python-ast.* > > > >> > are, in fact, checked in so they don't have to be rebuilt by the > > bots or > > > >> > users? > > > >> > > > >> We should have the buildbots run "make touch", so they don't need to > > > >> run asdl_c.py. > > > > > > > > > > > > How should we go about doing this? > > > > > > Complain to Antoine I suppose. :) > > > > Here you are: > > > > http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Snow%20Leop%203.x/builds/28/steps/compile/logs/stdio > > > > Of course, when it's using "-jN" there may be a race condition :-) > > > > Right, which is probably even worse than before because now it's > non-deterministic (first build will fail, subsequent will succeed). Only if "N" in "-jN" is big enough, I suspect. > Is there a way to split it to: > > $ make touch > $ make -jN all Probably but... I'm really too lazy to do this myself. Buildbot isn't very pleasant. Perhaps someone else wants to do it? Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4