RetroSearch Browse

Thu Sep 26 20:46:07 CEST 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-September/129005.html

> >> 2013/9/26 Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com>:
> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> > Earlier this morning I had a slight tackle with a couple of the 3.4
> bots
> >> > (sorry everyone!). I fixed some problems in asdl.py -
> >> > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/21d46e3ae60c - and used the 'with'
> >> > statement. Some bots don't have Python 2.6+ and couldn't bootstrap
> >> > Python-ast.h/c
> >> >
> >> > Two questions:
> >> >
> >> > * Should I always check-in Python-ast.h and Python-ast.c when I touch
> >> > asdl*
> >> > ? The generated files are unchanged, it's only the timestamp that
> >> > changed.
> >> > * Can we, in theory, use new Pythons for asdl* code, because
> >> > Python-ast.*
> >> > are, in fact, checked in so they don't have to be rebuilt by the bots
> or
> >> > users?
> >>
> >> We should have the buildbots run "make touch", so they don't need to
> >> run asdl_c.py.
> >
> >
> > How should we go about doing this?
>
> Complain to Antoine I suppose. :)
>
[+ Antoine]
Done :)

While we're at it, it seems that .hgtouch is wrong:

Include/ast.h: Parser/Python.asdl Parser/asdl.py Parser/asdl_c.py
Python/Python-ast.c: Include/ast.h

The file Include/ast.h is not, in fact, auto-generated. But
Include/Python-ast.h *is*, and it does not appear in this file.

Typo? [+Ezio]

Eli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130926/6c4cb3a2/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-September/129005.html below:

[Python-Dev] asdl.py and Python-ast.[hc]