On Sep 26, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > Le Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:22:55 -0400, > Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> a écrit : >> Ideally people won't be typing either of them because it'll be >> installed automatically. They might in some cases (accidentally >> uninstalled pip?) > > Installing from source perhaps. Ah yea, installing from source is the time when they'd execute it, that slipped my mind. > >> I agree that it seems there is paranoia going on here and that the >> risk is low and making it just be a special cased new feature is ok. >> However the point of the underscore prefix on 2.7 and 3.3 is to more >> effectively communicate that on these pythons you shouldn't rely on >> that module existing. > > That's a fair argument, although it also makes the thing a bit ugly. Yea It's not my preferred thing to do and I think that calling it just ensurepip is fine, however I think if folks are worried about it, it could offer a compromise. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130926/8728ea81/attachment.sig>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4