On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Earlier this morning I had a slight tackle with a couple of the 3.4 bots > (sorry everyone!). I fixed some problems in asdl.py - > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/21d46e3ae60c - and used the 'with' > statement. Some bots don't have Python 2.6+ and couldn't bootstrap > Python-ast.h/c > > Two questions: > > * Should I always check-in Python-ast.h and Python-ast.c when I touch > asdl* ? The generated files are unchanged, it's only the timestamp that > changed. > If Python-ast.* are checked in then yes. > * Can we, in theory, use new Pythons for asdl* code, because Python-ast.* > are, in fact, checked in so they don't have to be rebuilt by the bots or > users? > I don't see why not. the touch extension for hg is there specifically for these files to prevent having to regenerate them. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130926/6ed35b8c/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4