On 24 September 2013 17:25, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Preferring the status quo because > you're holding out a forlorn hope for a concise wording that explains: > > - there are places where exceptions may occur but the interpreter > can't reraise them > - this is one of those cases, so we're printing it to stderr instead > > *without users needing to do any research*. Oops, reworded the second part of that sentence without fixing the first part. It should have said: ============== It doesn't make sense to prefer the status quo because you're holding out a forlorn hope for a concise wording that explains: - there are places where exceptions may occur but the interpreter can't reraise them - this is one of those cases, so we're printing it to stderr instead *without users needing to do any research*. ============== Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4