On 23 September 2013 18:45, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > Le Mon, 23 Sep 2013 18:17:51 +1000, > Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> Here's what I suggest changing that error to: >> >> >>> del x >> Unraisable exception suppressed when calling <bound method C.__del__ >> of <__main__.C object at 0x7f98b8b61538>> >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "<stdin>", line 3, in __del__ >> RuntimeError: Going away now > > Why not simply "Exception automatically caught in <bound method > C.__del__> [...]" ? It only answers the "what" (i.e. the exception was automatically caught), without addressing the "why" (i.e. because there wasn't anything else useful the interpreter could do with it) "Suppressed" also says more than "caught" does, since "caught and reraised the exception" makes sense, while "suppressed and reraised the exception" contradicts itself. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4