On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Ronald Oussoren <ronaldoussoren at mac.com>wrote: > On 14 Sep, 2013, at 8:30, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > However, I agree the current wording only conveys that to the handful > > of people that already know exactly when in the attribute lookup > > sequence that step occurs, which is a rather niche audience :) > > I've been fooling around with this long enough that I forgot that not > everyone knows this :-). > > I guess I'd better include a clearer and more complete description > of the current attribute resolution protocol and how my proposal affects > that. A nice readable Python implementation of that protocol would be nice > to have regardless of the fate of this PEP. > +1 -eric -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130919/f22ef310/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4