On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:48:49PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > That's OK, especially if running "pip" recommends installing "python-pip" and > "pyvenv" and "extractpip" are also separated out so that running "pyvenv" > recommends installing a suitable package that depends on both Python and > "python-pip". Sounds sane to me! > We can add that to the PEP as an alternative approach for redistributors to > take that still offers a reasonable end-user experience. That'd really be great, and I'm sure it'd cut off the small bit of concern some Debian-folk have about this stuff :) Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paultag at debian.org> : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130919/bd096e17/attachment.sig>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4