Le Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:54:32 +0200, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> a écrit : > Am 18.09.13 08:43, schrieb Gregory P. Smith: > > Just drop support for 10.6 with Python 3.4. Problem solved. People > > on that old of a version of the OS can build their own Python 3.4 > > or do the right thing and upgrade or just install Linux. > > > > This isn't Windows. Compiler tool chains are freely available for > > the legacy platform. We don't need to maintain such a long legacy > > support tail there ourselves. > > I don't mind such a decision in principle, but also in principle, I'd > prefer if there was a pre-set policy to decide this question, > documented in PEP 11. > > Here a piece of OSX release history: > - 10.5: October 2007 > * 10.5.8: August 2009 > - 10.6: August 2009 > * 10.6.8: July 2011 > - 10.7: July 2011 > * 10.7.5: July 2012 > - 10.8: July 2012 This means that any Mac shipped pre-July 2011 has 10.6 or lower? I know Mac users are fashion victims, but 2011 doesn't sound that old to me ;-) (it's even younger than Barry!) Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4