A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-September/128706.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 428: Pathlib

[Python-Dev] PEP 428: Pathlib [Python-Dev] PEP 428: PathlibCharles-François Natali cf.natali at gmail.com
Mon Sep 16 19:06:37 CEST 2013
2013/9/16 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>:
> Le Sun, 15 Sep 2013 06:46:08 -0700,
> Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> a écrit :
>> I see PEP 428 is both targeted at 3.4 and still in draft status.
>>
>> What remains to be done to ask for pronouncement?
>
> I think I have a couple of items left to integrate in the PEP.
> Mostly it needs me to take a bit of time and finalize the PEP, and
> then have a PEP delegate (or Guido) pronounce on it.

IIRC, during the last discussion round, we were still debating between
implicit stat() result caching - which requires an explicit restat()
method - vs a mapping between the stat() method and a stat() syscall.

What was the conclusion?
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4