Le Sun, 15 Sep 2013 06:46:08 -0700, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> a écrit : > I see PEP 428 is both targeted at 3.4 and still in draft status. > > What remains to be done to ask for pronouncement? I think I have a couple of items left to integrate in the PEP. Mostly it needs me to take a bit of time and finalize the PEP, and then have a PEP delegate (or Guido) pronounce on it. That's unless someone else wants to add it, of course. I don't mind suggestions, as long as they don't deter from the short-/middle-term goal of getting the PEP approved :) Note that the pathlib API has to be provisional. While "OO path objects" have been a common desire for a long time, it is a much less well-paved avenue than e.g. TransformDict :) Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4