On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 22:07:50 +0300 Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote: > 14.09.13 20:41, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла): > > On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 09:43:13 -0700 > > Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > >> Still, I think it would be useful to expose the transform function. > >> Any good reason not to? > > > > No good reason. What's the name? transform_func? > > There is one reason -- serialization. For example pickle saves the > transform function as an argument for TransformDict constructor. Repr > exposes the transform function too (in evaluable representation). Other > serializers need the transform function too. My implementations expose > it as public property (transform), your -- as private attribute > (_transform). > > Or perhaps I misunderstood you? "No good reason" not to expose it. It was a double negation, sorry ;-) Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4