On 09/14/2013 10:41 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 09:43:13 -0700 Ethan Furman wrote: >> >> Still, I think it would be useful to expose the transform function. >> Any good reason not to? > > No good reason. What's the name? transform_func? I had originally thought transform_key, but transform_func is also good, and possibly less confusing. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4