On 09/11/2013 08:48 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Le Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:48:56 -0700, > Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> a écrit : >> >> Personally, I wouldn't mind having all four; for one thing, the name >> 'transformdict' would then be entirely appropriate. ;) > > The key decoder function is quite useless since the original key is > retained. As for the value encoder/decoder, I don't really see the > point: just store whichever value you want to retrieve later. The main > point of transformdict is that the *lookup* is done using a different > key than the user-provided key. Very good points. I am convinced. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4